Tag Archives: commentary

How the Conquered Storm Points to Christ

You can start reading a PDF version of  right now.

Every so often I hear a story about someone drowning in the ocean. A child dragged to her death by the undertow.

That’s why my wife and I give ample, rigid warning to our own children when we visit the ocean:

“Hold our hands tight.”

Our last two visits to the ocean–the Atlantic and the Gulf–occurred just days after hurricanes bull rushed the coast. So winds remained fierce. Waves, relentless. We barely even set foot into the sea.

The Storm Descending on the Boat

Similar circumstances–gale-like winds, wall-like waves–were common on another sea. The Sea of Galilee.

Long ago Jesus and his disciples were on the western shore of this sea. Jesus wanted to escape the crush of the crowd. So he and his disciples climbed into a boat. They sailed to the eastern shore where there was no large city, thus fewer people.

But at some point during their trip a severe storm pushed its way across the sea. Jesus’ disciples–aware of what could happen if trapped in such a storm–feared they would drown.

Jesus, on the other hand, slept.

Eventually his disciples woke him up. They pointed to the storm and screamed, “We’re going to die!” And what happened next demonstrates Jesus’ unlimited power over the natural world.

The Storm Subdued by a Man

Storms don’t die quickly. Nor on cue from a human command. Yet, on that day, Jesus immediately muzzled the storm with the words, “Hush, be still.” And when the storm ceased, the disciples’ hearts sank. Not in sadness nor relief.

But terror.

Terror that something more powerful than a boat-crushing, human-drowning force was in the boat with them. And it was this terror that precipitated the question, “Who is this that the wind and the sea obey him?”

The Conquered Storm Points to Christ

This story of the sea being stilled occurred well before Peter’s confession that Jesus was Christ.

In Mark, it occurs after Jesus heals many people of illness, deformities and demon possession. Thus, this story of the sea being stilled rises in the Markian narrative above all supernatural events before it and culminates with the question, “Who is this?”

It’s like a primer for the : “Who do you say that I am?”

At that point in Mark 8:29…is there any question who Jesus is? Any resistance? Any doubt to his authority over sin and death? Jesus cast out demons. Restored mangled limbs. Cured lingering diseases. Lifted children from the dead. And subdued the sea.

The Storm Submitted–Will You?

Of course, doubters existed. Judas was more than likely in the boat. And doubters exist today.

Why did Judas doubt? Why do people doubt today? : “For everyone who does evil hates the Light, and does not come to the Light for fear that his deeds will be exposed.”

This is what breaks my heart: In the face of mounting evidence to the authority of Christ, people who reject Jesus needlessly  against themselves.

In the end, Jesus offers two ways: Submit to his power. Or suffer under it. There is no middle ground.

**Part of The Messiah: Eleven Meditations from the Book of Mark series.** You can start reading a PDF version of  right now.

The Messiah: Peter’s Confession of Christ

You can start reading a PDF version of  right now.

Shortly after Jesus heals a blind man, he walks toward the villages of Caesarea Philippi with his disciples.

Along the way  about who people think he is.

They tell him John the Baptist. Or Elijah. Or one of the prophets.

He asks them, “Who do you think I am?” Peter confesses: “You are the Christ.”

An Objection to This Confession

Some scholars see this episode as a post-Easter confession of the church read back onto Peter’s lips.

Yet this theory can’t plausibly account for the rebuke in , since that is not a detail the church is likely to invent.

And so it’s best to conclude that Peter’s confession was historical and that Jesus accepted it, although on his own terms, as you’ll see in a minute.

The Suffering, Crucified Liberator?

Peter replied to Jesus’ question on behalf of the twelve. And he clearly and unequivocally affirmed that he–along with the twelve–believed Jesus to be the Messiah.

However, the disciples expected the Messiah to come as a conquering general, a political liberator.

Not a sacrificial lamb.

Jesus knew this. That’s why his follow up statement to Peter’s confession was a prediction of his own suffering and death.

Yet Peter rejected such a notion. He could handle Jesus being Messiah. But he could not handle Jesus being crucified. Regardless, Jesus’ messianic mission cannot be understood apart from the cross.

The Messiah and the Cross

First century Palestinian Jews understood that the Messiah would be . That’s why parallels between Moses and Jesus were abundant.

But, like Luther said, “Jesus was no Moses.” In the end, Moses is but a household servant. Christ, the maker and master of all things.

For an ex-Pharisee and former church persecutor named Paul, this message penetrated every inch of his preaching: Nothing was worthy compared to the glory of the crucified Christ.

All paled in comparison.

And it was Paul’s all-consuming passion for others to  in the person of Jesus. That’s my passion, too.

So I have to ask, “Who do you say Jesus is?” The answer to this question will determine your eternal destiny.

**Part of The Messiah: Eleven Meditations from the Book of Mark series.** You can start reading a PDF version of  right now.

31 Biblical Facts about Man’s Spirit

Given the space I devoted yesterday to spiritual death, I thought I’d follow up today with a post on the biblical case for man’s spirit.

Here we go.

1. Man has a spirit. 

2. Man’s spirit is immortal. [See the heading ]

3. Man’s spirit can be divided from the body and destroyed. .

4. God’s spirit contends with man’s spirit. [Some translations say “abide.”] 

5. Can be sad or vexed to the point a person can’t eat. 

6. Man’s spirit can be encouraged and motivated. 

7. Can be in anguish. 

8. Can turn against God. 

9. Can search for meaning and truth. 

10. Man’s spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak. 

11. Can be revived by water or food.  and 

12. Can be faithful and steadfast in the Lord. 

13. Can be rebellious. 

14. Can faint and melt in despair and fear. 

15. Can be reborn. 

16. Can be grieved and troubled and alarmed. 

17. Can be drug down by lethargy and stupor. 

18. Can be fervent. 

19. Can be meek and gentle. 

20. Can be present though the body is absent. 

21. Can be holy. 

22. Can be restless. 

23. Can be filthy. 

24. Can be lifted out of sorrow. 

25. Can be in unity with others. 

26. Can worship God. 

27. Can rejoice. 

28. Can be an example to others. 

29. Leaves body at death. 

30. Can be dead through sin. 

31. Can be made alive in Christ. 

Naturally, this is not an exhaustive list, so…what’d I miss that you think I should include? Looking forward to your thoughts. Brutal and all.

Profile of an Apostate: 18 Easy Indicators

The book of Jude says we should declare war on apostates. Who are apostates? Here’s 18 ways to spot one.

Yesterday we explored four different ways of explaining the sin that leads to death.

I walked away suggesting that this sin is apostasy–someone who, once a believer, rejects Christ.

And I also suggested that we–in spite of John’s recommendation–pray for these people.

Now, that doesn’t mean we don’t declare war on them.

Not too long ago Don at  asked “Does [combating heresy] yield any fruit?”

My answer is yes.

Combating Heresy Can Yield Fruit

In the interest of Christ’s character and the safety of our flock, we do need to draw the line and defend our territory.

In gentleness and respect, of course.

But who exactly are we declaring war on? And how do we spot an apostate? Good questions, indeed.

In the  we get our answers. In fact, we get 18 answers. Apostates are:

1. Godless 

2. Morally perverted v. 4

3. Deniers of Christ v. 4

4. Dreamers 

5. Defilers of the flesh v. 8

6. Rejectors of authority v. 8

7. Slanderers holy angels v. 8

8. Ignorant of the faith 

9. Illogical and unreasonable v. 10

10. Self-destructive in behavior v. 10

10. Complainers 

11. Critics v. 16

12. Self seeking v. 16

13. Arrogant v. 16

14. Flatterers for their own advantage v. 16

15. Scoffers 

16. Creators of division 

17. Wordly minded v. 19

18. Without the Spirit v. 19

One thing I don’t know: Is the author of Jude talking about people outside or inside of the church? I have to go with inside. Here’s why.

Not absolutely certain, but it seems to jive with the end of  where Paul says we are to judge those inside the church and not those outside.

Furthermore,  states “For certain persons have crept in unnoticed….”

Crept in where? I’m thinking the church. And I’m thinking they crept in in disguise. These are the people we’re supposed to . What do you think: Am I right?

Four Ways of Looking at the Sin That Leads to Death

Serious v. minor. The unforgivable sin. Physical death as punishment. Spiritual death. Which one best describes the sin that leads to death? You decide.

I’ve been rummaging around 1 John again. Particularly the 5th Chapter…

There is a sin leading to death. 

This concept of a sin that leads to death can be a notorious torment to readers because there are a number of ways you can twist it.

Now, sin that leads to death…it occurs in the Old Testament in the books ,  and .

In each instance physical death is the consequence of sin. Not much room for misinterpretation.

In the New Testament context, however, it’s not so cut and dry. But scholars and pundits have boiled the interpretation down to four fundamental ideas.

Let’s look at and evaluate these four ways.

Serious Sin v. Minor Sin

On the surface, the sin that leads to death could simply refer to serious sins over minor sins.

If this is the case, the author may be telling his readers to pray for a brother on behalf of a minor sin, but should leave those who commit more serious sins to the care of God.

But it’s unlikely this is the true meaning.

The Unforgivable Sin

Another way to look at this concept is to see it as identical with the “unforgivable sin” Jesus mentioned in  and , namely being ashamed of Him.

Jesus also suggests  is the unforgivable sin. This is closer to the truth. But were not there yet.

Physical Death as Punishment

Some interpreters see the “sin resulting in death” as a sin so serious that the sinner deserves to die…

Immediately.

It’s not one particular sin like homosexuality or lying or idolatry. It could be any grave, calculated and unconfessed sin that exhausts God’s patience.

In the early church, this was an extreme but effective form of . This is seen in the .

But I don’t think this is how were supposed to walk away with it either.

Spiritual Death

In all of John’s literature there’s a tendency to talk about spiritual rather than physical death that makes this final option the best option.

For example,  evaluates the Church at Sardis as follows: “I know your deeds, that you have a name that you are alive, but you are dead.”

A clear reference to spiritual death.

So, in 1 John, there is evidence that John had unbelievers in mind when he wrote 5:16. The author also spoke about unbelievers who ,  and .

These opponents–once believers–eventually departed from the church. Now they’re all spiritually dead.

Now, pay attention: Jesus, in his , excludes the “world” from his prayers. This sets a precedent.

And it makes sense.

Following the behavior of Jesus, John warns his readers against praying for apostates–believers who walked away from the church.

Thus the sin leading to death refers to the apostasy–refusing to believe in Jesus as the Christ–which marked a person as an unbeliever and sealed their fate.

And John says were not supposed to pray for them.

Our Response to the Sin Leading to Death

But that sounds so narrow minded. Fundamental. Extreme. Unbiblical. Yet, that’s exactly what John suggests you do. And that’s the kicker.

It’s just a suggestion. Not a law.

So, do we pray for those who’ve fallen away even though John recommends we don’t?

I say we do.

Only God knows who has committed the unpardonable sin. We don’t have the knowledge or authority to make such claims.

But what do you think? Am I missing anything? Do you know of any other theories on how 1 John 5:16 is handled? I look forward to your responses, brutal and all.